June 15th, 2007

Junk, they called it. Junk DNA. Now that scientists are taking a fresh look, it seems like that may not be the case. That “junk” may be the OS that runs the programs we call genes. (And at 97% of our genetic material, it makes Vista look positively parsimonious.)
HE/SHE

It also makes the wonderful sculpture of Tim Noble and Sue Webster look improbably prophetic. They construct perfect human forms from complex and random-seeming collections of junk found on London streets. It’s only when you look at it the right way that it starts to make sense.

Popularity: 6% [?]


Eva Moon's main website is here.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “It all looked like junk”

  1. 1
    Dreah Says:

    I haven’t heard the latest theories about genetic junk, but a previous explanation that made sense to me was that the junk helped limit the effects of mutations. If 97% of your genes don’t do anything, then a random mutation most likely won’t have any effect at all.

Was it good for you? Let me know.

  • Subscribe

    AddThis Feed Button
  • Bookmark/Share

    AddThis Social Bookmark Button
  •